生徒評価の基準<br>The Student Evaluation Standards : How to Improve Evaluations of Students

個数:

生徒評価の基準
The Student Evaluation Standards : How to Improve Evaluations of Students

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 264 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780761946625
  • DDC分類 371.271

Full Description

"Teachers make judgments about students every day, based on such formal and informal appraisals of their work as classroom observation, homework assignments, and teacher-made quizzes. Soon, they'll have the first set of professional standards to help guide them in making such decisions."
—Education Week

—Education Week A practical guide to designing and assessing student evaluation.

Student evaluation and assessment are central to every school and classroom. Evaluation and assessment are how we find out what students are learning, how they are progressing, and how we can make improvements for their future development. With requirements for testing and standards-based instruction at an all-time high, effective student evaluation is more essential today than ever before. But where in the instructional process should assessments occur? What kinds of questions should be asked? How is the information used to direct student learning? Who has the right to access and use this information?

The Joint Committee presents 28 certified standards for assessing evaluation practices in elementary and secondary classrooms. These standards are broken down into four essential attributes of sound evaluation, each providing definitions, guidelines, common errors, supportive documentation, and illustrative case studies:

Propriety standards, which protect individual rights
Utility standards, which ensure that evaluations are timely, informative, and influential
Feasibility standards, which recognize "real-world" dynamics and environmental influences
Accuracy standards, which determine whether an evaluation has produced sound information

These standards provide teachers and administrators with the tools they need to master every "nuance" of student evaluation, including validity, political viability, teacher biases, conflicts of interest, a student's right to privacy, and much more. But most important, they will help ensure that student evaluation practices are on track, so we can properly serve and improve student learning.

These standards have been approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and were developed with assistance from members of 16 professional societies:

American Association of School Administrators

American Counseling Association

American Educational Research Association

American Evaluation Association

American Psychological Association

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Canadian Evaluation Society

Canadian Society for the Study of Education

Consortium for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation

Council of Chief State School Officers

National Association of Elementary School Principals

National Association of Secondary School Principals

National Council on Measurement in Education

National Education Association

National Legislative Program Evaluation Society

National School Boards Association

Contents

Functional Table of Contents
The Joint Committee
Acknowledgments
Invitation to Users
Preface
Introduction
Applying the Standards
The Standards
1. Proprietary Standards
Service to Students
Appropriate Policies and Procedures
Access to Evaluation Information
Treatment of Students
Rights of Students
Balanced Evaluation
Conflict of Interest
2. Utility Standards
Constructive Orientation
Defined Users and Uses
Information Scope
Evaluator Qualifications
Explicit Values
Effective Reporting
Follow-Up
3. Feasibility Standards
Practical Orientation
Political Viability
Evaluation Support
4. Accuracy Standards
Validity Orientation
Defined Expectations for Students
Context Analysis
Documented Procedures
Defensible Information
Reliable Information
Bias Identification and Management
Handling Information and Quality Control
Analysis of Information
Justified Conclusions
Metaevaluation
Appendix: The Support Groups
Appendix: Checklist for Applying the Standards
Glossary
Index