ケプラー「新天文学」新解釈<br>The Composition of Kepler's Astronomia nova

個数:

ケプラー「新天文学」新解釈
The Composition of Kepler's Astronomia nova

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 328 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780691007380
  • DDC分類 520

基本説明

Drawing on Kepler's correspondence and manuscripts, Voelkel reveals that the unusual style of Astronomia nova (1609), has been traditionally misinterpreted. Argues that Kepler's style can be understood only in the context of the circumstance in which the book was written.

Full Description

This is one of the most important studies in decades on Johannes Kepler, among the towering figures in the history of astronomy. Drawing extensively on Kepler's correspondence and manuscripts, James Voelkel reveals that the strikingly unusual style of Kepler's magnum opus, Astronomia nova (1609), has been traditionally misinterpreted. Kepler laid forth the first two of his three laws of planetary motion in this work. Instead of a straightforward presentation of his results, however, he led readers on a wild goose chase, recounting the many errors and false starts he had experienced. This had long been deemed a "confessional" mirror of the daunting technical obstacles Kepler faced. As Voelkel amply demonstrates, it is not. Voelkel argues that Kepler's style can be understood only in the context of the circumstances in which the book was written. Starting with Kepler's earliest writings, he traces the development of the astronomer's ideas of how the planets were moved by a force from the sun and how this could be expressed mathematically. And he shows how Kepler's once broader research program was diverted to a detailed examination of the motion of Mars.
Above all, Voelkel shows that Kepler was well aware of the harsh reception his work would receive--both from Tycho Brahe's heirs and from contemporary astronomers; and how this led him to an avowedly rhetorical pseudo-historical presentation of his results. In treating Kepler at last as a figure in time and not as independent of it, this work will be welcomed by historians of science, astronomers, and historians.

Contents

List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments xi Preface xiii Introduction 1 PART 1: THE MYSTERIUM COSMOGRAPHICUM 11 CHAPTER ONE: The Copernican Context 13 CHAPTER TWO: The Development of the Mysterium cosmographicum 26 CHAPTER THREE: The Mysterium cosmographicum 46 CHAPTER FOUR: Responses to the Mysterium cosmographicum 60 PART 2: THE ASTRONOMIA NOVA 93 CHAPTER FIVE: Kepler and Tycho 97 CHAPTER SIX: Kepler's Work after Tycho's Death 130 CHAPTER SEVEN: The Tychonics 142 CHAPTER EIGHT: David Fabricius 170 CHAPTER NINE: The Rhetorical Character of the Astronomia nova 211 CONCLUSION 247 Notes 255 Bibliograpby 295 Index 301 Index of Correspondence 307