- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Politics / International Relations
基本説明
Through the growth of internationalization and a growing acceptance of immigration rights, union leaders now tend to support more open immigration policies. Haus offers a clear argument of how unions have changed their position from the beginning to the end of the century.
Full Description
Labor unions in France and the U.S. opposed certain restrictionist immigration policy measures in the late twentieth century, whereas they had pressured for restrictionism in the early twentieth century. Leah Haus asks why unions changed coalitions. Haus argues that one needs to focus on the challenges of internationalization to explain this change. Many union leaders consider economic internationalization and/or the internationalization of human rights as undermining the effectiveness and/or desirability of certain restrictionist measures. At the same time, many union leaders see support for certain non-restrictionist measures as a way to facilitate organizing immigrants, which is an alternative strategy for improving wages and work conditions.
Contents
Introduction Explaining Union Immigration Policy Preferences In Pursuit of Complete Control Pragmatic Adaptation French First Resisting Restrictionists Conclusion