フェミニズムで読むクワイン<br>Feminist Interpretations of W. V. Quine (Re-reading the Canon)

個数:

フェミニズムで読むクワイン
Feminist Interpretations of W. V. Quine (Re-reading the Canon)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 448 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780271022956
  • DDC分類 191

Full Description

As one of the preeminent philosophers of the twentieth century, W. V. Quine (1908-2000) made groundbreaking contributions to the philosophy of science, mathematical logic, and the philosophy of language. This collection of essays examines Quine's views, particularly his holism and naturalism, for their value (and their limitations) to feminist theorizing today.

Some contributors to this volume see Quine as severely challenging basic tenets of the logico-empiricist tradition in the philosophy of science—the analytic/synthetic distinction, verificationism, foundationalism—and accept various of his positions as potential resources for feminist critique. Other contributors regard Quine as an unrepentant empiricist and, unlike feminists who seek to use or extend his arguments, they interpret his positions as far less radical and more problematic.

In particular, critics and advocates of Quine's arguments that the philosophy of science should be "naturalized"—understood and pursued as an enterprise continuous with the sciences proper—disagree deeply about whether such a naturalized philosophy is "philosophy enough." Central issues at stake in these disagreements reflect current questions of special interest to feminists and also bridge the analytic and postmodern traditions. They include questions about whether and how the philosophy of science, as a form of practice, is or can be normative as well as questions concerning the implications of Quine's philosophy of language for the transparency and stability of meaning.

In representing feminist philosophy centrally engaged with the analytic tradition, this volume is important not only for what it contributes to the understanding of Quine and naturalized epistemology but also for what it accomplishes in working against restrictive conceptions of the place of feminism within the discipline.

Aside from the editors, the contributors are Kathryn Pyne Addelson, Louise M. Antony, Richmond Campbell, Lorraine Code, Jane Duran, Maureen Linker, Phyllis Rooney, and Paul A. Roth.

Contents

Contents

Acknowledgments

Preface

Introduction

Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson

Part I: Early Feminist Analyses of Quine

1. Who Knows: From Quine to Feminist Empiricism

Lynn Hankinson Nelson (1990)

2. Quine as Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology

Louise M. Antony (1994)

Part II: Is Quinean "Naturalized Philosophy of Science" Philosophy of Science Enough?

3. A Case for a Responsibly Rationalized Feminist Epistemology

Maureen Linker

4. What Is Natural About Epistemology Naturalized?

Lorraine Code

5. Feminist Epistemology and Naturalized Epistemology: An Uneasy Alliance

Phyllis Rooney

6. Naturalizing Quine

Kathryn Pyne Addelson

Part III: Explications, Expansions, and Revisions of Quinean Positions

7. Feminism and Naturalism: If Asked for Theories, Just Say 'No'

Paul A. Roth

8. The Last Dogma of Empiricism?

Jack Nelson

9. Feminist Epistemology Naturalized

Richmond Campbell

10. Quine and Feminist Theory

Jane Duran

11. Feminist Naturalized Philosophy of Science

Lynn Hankinson Nelson

Bibliography

Index

Contributors