刑事裁判における対審構造の起源<br>The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford Studies in Modern Legal History)

個数:

刑事裁判における対審構造の起源
The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford Studies in Modern Legal History)

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 376 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780199258888
  • DDC分類 345.4205

基本説明

New in paperback. Hardcover was published in 2003.

Full Description

The adversary system of trial, the defining feature of the Anglo-American criminal procedure developed late in English legal history. For centuries, defendants were forbidden to have counsel, and lawyers seldom appeared for the prosecution either. Trial was meant to be an occasion for the defendant to answer the charges in person.

The transformation from lawyer-free to lawyer-dominated criminal trial happened within the space of about a century, from the 1690s to the 1780s. This book explains how the lawyers captured the trial. In addition to conventional legal sources, Professor Langbein draws upon a rich vein of contemporary pamphlet accounts about trials in London's Old Bailey. The book also mines these novel sources to provide the first detailed account of the formation of the law of criminal evidence.

Responding to menacing prosecutorial initiatives (including reward-seeking thieftakers amd crown witnesses induced to testify in order to save their own necks), the judges of the 1730s decided to allow the defendant to have counsel to cross-examine accusing witnesses. By restricting counsel to the work of examining and cross-examining witnesses, the judges intended that the accused would still need to respond in person to the charges against him. Langbein shows how counsel manipulated the dynamics of adversary procedure to defeat the judges' design, ultimately silencing the accused and transforming the very purpose of the criminal trial. Trial ceased to be an opportunity for the accused to speak, and became instead an occasion for defense counsel to test the prosecution case.

Contents

INTRODUCTION ; 1. The Lawyer-Free Criminal Trial ; The Altercation ; The Rapidity of Trial ; The Rule Against Defence Counsel ; The Marian Pretrial ; The 'Accused Speaks' Trial ; The Plight of the Accused ; 2. The Treason Trials Act of 1696: The Advent of Defense Counsel ; The Treason Trials of the Later Stuarts ; The Critque of the Trials ; The Provisions of the Act ; The Restriction to Treason ; Of Aristocrats and Paupers: Treason's Legacy for Adversary Criminal Justice ; 3. The Prosecutorial Origins of Defence Counsel ; Prosecution Lawyers ; Prosecution Perjury ; Making Forgery Felony ; Evening Up: Defense Counsel Enters the Felony Trial ; 4. The Law of Criminal Evidence ; The View From the Sessions Papers ; The Character Rule ; The Corroboraion Rule ; The Confession Rule ; Unfinished Business: The Hearsay Rule ; Groping for the Lever: Excluding Evidence ; 5. From Altercation to Adversary Trial ; Latency ; Silencing the Accused ; Prosecution Counsel ; Defense Counsel ; Judicial Acquiescence ; Jury Trial ; The Truth Deficit