- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Philosophy
基本説明
Two contemporary philosophers in sharp opposition, debate the value of affirmative action and racial preference.
Full Description
Cohen and Sterba, two contemporary philosophers in sharp opposition, debate the value of affirmative action and racial preference. They defend thier views with analysis and commentay on landmark cases - including the decisions of the United States Supreme Court and the University of Michigan admissions cases, Gratz and Grutter.
Contents
Preface One, Carl Cohen
Preface Two, James P. Sterba
Cases
SECTION ONE: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG AND BAD, Carl Cohen
Prologue: Wrongness and Badness:
PART I: EQUALITY AND RACE PREFERENCE
1: Equality as a Moral Ideal
2: Affirmative Action
3: Race Preference: The Transformation of Affirmative Action
PART II: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG
4: Race Preference Is Morally Wrong
5: Race Preference Is Against the Law
6: Race Preference Violates the Constitution
PART III: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS BAD
7: Race Preference Is Bad for the Minorities Preferred
8: Race Preference Is Bad for the Universities that Give Preference
9: Race Preference Is Bad for Society as a Whole
Epilogue: The Future of Race Preference:
SECTION TWO: DEFENDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, DEFENDING PREFERENCES, James P. Sterba
1: A Legal History of Affirmative Action in the United States
2: A Definition of Affirmative Action
3: A Defense of Outreach Affirmative Action
4: A Defense of Remedial Affirmative Action
5: Remedial Affirmative Action and the U.S. Supreme Court
6: Racial Discrimination v. Sexual Discrimination
7: A Better Standard of Proof for Remedial Affirmative Action
8: A Defense of Diversity Affirmative Action
9: Objections to Affirmative Action
10: Affirmative Action outside the United States
Conclusion:
SECTION THREE: REPLY TO JAMES P. STERBA, Carl Cohen
SECTION FOUR: REPLY TO CARL COHEN, James P. Sterba
SECTION FIVE: COMMENTS ON THE SUPREME COURT DECISION, Carl Cohen and James P. Sterba
Bibliography:
Index:
