哲学の評価<br>Evaluating Philosophies (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science) 〈Vol. 295〉

個数:

哲学の評価
Evaluating Philosophies (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science) 〈Vol. 295〉

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 240 p./サイズ 10 illus.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9789400744073
  • DDC分類 501

基本説明

Proposes and illustrates a simple criterion for evaluating any philosophical doctrine: Does it help advance knowledge?

Full Description

 

 
The first part deals with philosophies that have had a significant input, positive or negative, on the search for truth; it suggests that scientific and technological are either stimulated or smothered by a philosophical matrix; and it outlines two ontological doctrines believed to have nurtured research in modern times: systemism (not to be mistaken for holism) and materialism (as an extension of physicalism).
 
The second part discusses a few practical problems that are being actively discussed in the literature, from climatology and information science to
economics and legal philosophy. This discussion is informed by the general principles analyzed in the first part of the book. Some of the conclusions are that standard economic theory is just as inadequate as Marxism; that law and order are weak without justice; and that the central equation of normative climatology is a tautology-which of course does not put climate change in doubt.
 
The third and final part of the book tackles a set of key concepts, such as those of indicator, energy, and existence, that have been either taken for granted or neglected. For instance, it is argued that there is at least one existence predicate, and that it is unrelated to the so-called existential quantifier; that high level hypotheses cannot be put to the test unless conjoined with indicator hypotheses; and that induction cannot produce high level hypotheses because empirical data do not contain any transempirical concepts. Realism, materialism, and systemism
are thus refined and vindicated.
 

Contents

Preface.- Introduction.-  
A. How to Nuture of Hinder Research.-
1 Philosophies and phobosophies.-
2 The philosophical matrix of scientific progress.-
3 Systemics and materalism.-

 

B. Philosophy in Action.-

4 Technoscience?.-
5 Climate and logic.-
6 Information Science: one or many?.-
7 Wealth and wellbeing.-
8 Can standard economic theory explain crises?.-
9 Marxism: Promise and reality.-
10 Rules of law: Just and unjust.-

 

C Philosophical Gaps.- 
11 Are subjective probabilities admissible? .-
12 Can induction deliver high-level hypotheses?  .-  
13 Bridging theory to data.-
14 Energy: physics or metaphysics?  .-
15 Does quantum physics refute realism? .-
16 Parallel universes? ¿Digital physics?  .-
17 Can functionalist psychology explain?.-
18 Knowledge pyramids and rosettes.-
19 Existence: one or two?.-
20 Conclusion: Evaluation Criterion.-

 

21 Glossary.

 ​